立場新聞 Stand News

持2千億港股 挪威主權基金:若落實同股不同權 必須保護小股東

2018/3/26 — 13:21

港交所就同股不同權的公眾諮詢已於上周五截止,資產規模達到1萬億美元、全球最大的主權基金挪威主權財富基金去信港交所表達意見,指如果港交所允許同股不同權,就需要引入額外措施保護少數投資者,包括為不同投票權設定時間限制。該基金指,截至2017年底,基金投資在香港上市股票的金額有266億美元(相當2087億港元)。

挪威政府養老基金上周五向港交所遞交意見書,指支持鼓勵公司上市的措施,但對少數股東受到的影響感到擔憂。「我們認為保護少數股東的權利,是保障和提升基金長期利益的必需條件。」「為了維持對投資者的保障,我們認為有必要提出額外的措施。」

該基金在網站刊出的信件表示,這些措施包括實施日落條款即限時廢除不平等的投票權,強化非執行董事的獨立性,對於涉及持有特權投票權者的關連交易,應該嚴格遵循「一股一票」原則。

廣告

Letter sent to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited, 23 March 2018

We refer to the consultation of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“the Exchange”) on a listing regime for companies from emerging and innovative sectors, dated 23 February, and we welcome the opportunity to contribute our perspective.

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) is the investment management division of the Norwegian Central Bank (Norges Bank) and is responsible for investing the Government Pension Fund Global. NBIM is a globally diversified investor with USD 26.6 billion (HKD 207.9 billion) invested in equities listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong at the end of 2017. We have a substantial presence in all major equity markets globally, including in Asia, and we are a member of the Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA). We regard the protection of minority shareholder rights as a necessary requirement to safeguard and promote the fund’s long-term financial interests.  

In our response of 17 August 2017 to the Exchange’s “New Board Concept Paper”1, we highlighted the importance of taking into account the interests of all stakeholders in the listing environment2. As a global investor, we recognise the benefits of competition between listing venues for well-functioning markets. NBIM is also supportive of measures that motivate companies to go public, both in the early phase of their life cycles and in more mature stages. However, we are concerned when these measures affect the protection of minority shareholders’ rights, for instance with the introduction of unequal voting structures. We are encouraged by an increasing awareness that voting rights are a fundamental issue for all shareholders, as indicated by recent decisions of global index providers to consider voting rights as a criterion for index inclusion.

In the present proposal, the Exchange has opted to allow listings with unequal voting rights. We note that the Exchange proposes certain measures for investor protection. In this context, we welcome the stated intention to limit unequal voting rights to very special cases. We agree with the statement that “the one share one vote principle continues to be the optimum method of empowering shareholders and aligning their interests in a company”.

If unequal voting structures were to be introduced, we would support the proposal that certain matters should always be subject to “one share one vote”. We also welcome the safeguards that seek to ensure that unequal voting rights are limited to a few individuals who have contributed to the growth of the business, and are non-transferrable. We agree with the Exchange that allowing corporate entities to benefit from unequal voting rights would be a significant new development and we welcome the Exchange’s cautiousness.

To maintain market standards for investor protection, we see the need for additional measures. First, we would like to see a time-based sunset clause for unequal voting rights, in addition to the so-called “natural sunset”. Second, we recommend adding related party transactions involving entities associated with holders of weighted voting rights to the list of items that should always be subject to “one share one vote”. Furthermore, we would encourage the Exchange to replace the proposed wording “will reserve the right to reject” by a clear statement in the rules that a structure with zero voting rights would not be permitted. Finally, we consider that the proposed investor protection safeguards should apply to both primary listing and secondary listing on the Exchange.

As the Exchange is proposing substantial changes to the listing regime which could increase risks for minority shareholders, it is important for companies listed in Hong Kong to have independent and effective boards. Therefore, we recommend strengthening standards governing the independence of non-executive directors and the assessment of the board.

We appreciate your willingness to consider our perspective, and we remain at your disposal should you wish to discuss these matters further.

Yours faithfully

Carine Smith Ihenacho                                                     
Chief Corporate Governance Officer

Jonas Jølle
Head of Policy Development, Corporate Governance

 

廣告

 

發表意見